• Solutions
  • Company
  • Resources
  • Docs

Evaluating data: How much training data do you need for machine learning?

AI models and algorithms are like sponges, thirsty for training data. The more high-quality training data they soak up, the better their performance. But the keyword here is 'quality.'

Evaluating data: How much training data do you need for machine learning?

How much data do you need for machine learning? The answer to this question actually relies on both quantity and quality. A model's success is determined not just by how much data it is trained on but also by the relevance, diversity, and cleanliness of this input data.

However, acquiring, cleaning, and labeling this data is often expensive and time-consuming. In this article, we'll guide you through determining how much data is required and the quality of data you need for training your machine learning model. We will also discuss how data labeling tools like Kili Technology can help.

Knowing When You Have Enough Data

Define success

Before asking how much data you need, know that every AI journey begins with a destination in mind: the specific objective you want your model to achieve. This objective could range from minimizing a loss function, such as Mean Squared Error (MSE) in a regression task, to optimizing a business KPI like reducing churn rate in customer retention or improving user engagement metrics in a recommendation system. This step necessitates understanding and quantifying the desired outcome of your model's performance. 

Rule of thumb for initial data volume

How much data is needed for a machine learning algorithm? How many samples per class do you need? The answer to this varies widely depending on the complexity of your problem and the specific model you're implementing. Using a basic logistic regression model, you might get reasonable results with a few hundred samples per class for a simple binary classification problem. However, you'd likely need tens of thousands of samples per class for a deep learning model that recognizes hundreds of object categories in images. One can leverage public datasets, pre-trained models, and foundation models like GPT and SAM integrated with a data labeling tool as a strategic way to bootstrap your model training process.

Generally, a good practice is starting with a smaller, manageable dataset and gradually adding more training data, monitoring the performance improvements. We'll discuss this technique further in the article. But, it's vital to ensure that the model or algorithm chosen can handle the data's volume, dimensionality, and inherent complexities.

Iterative approach and monitoring performance

Machine learning is an iterative process, much like sculpting from a rough piece of stone. You chip away, constantly shaping and refining until you reach your desired outcome. This process involves training your initial model, checking its performance against pre-defined success metrics, and diagnosing its shortcomings.

For instance, suppose your model is an email spam detector, and after the initial training, you notice it is flagging too many legitimate emails as spam (high false positive rate). In this case, you should revisit your model's design. Your model may need to be simplified and more balanced to the noisy characteristics in the training data. Or the problem lies in the features you selected; you might need to engineer better features that can differentiate spam from non-spam more effectively.

If you need more than fine-tuning the model design, it might signal that you need more diverse samples to represent better legitimate emails or a better cleaning of your input data to reduce noise. This cyclical process continues until you achieve a model that performs satisfactorily on your success metrics.

Evaluating the Quality of Your Data

Influencing factors of data quality: timeliness, validity, accuracy, relevance, completeness, and consistency.

Defining good-quality data

But it's not enough to ask, "How much data do I need?" High-quality data forms the cornerstone of any successful AI project. But what constitutes "high-quality" data? Good-quality data should be accurate, relevant, complete, diverse, valid, and timely. It should closely represent the problem you are trying to solve and capture the diversity and nuances of real-world scenarios.

For instance, if you need a computer vision model to identify vehicles, the data set must include different types of vehicles (like cars, buses, and motorcycles) in various colors, sizes, and shapes, viewed from different angles, in different lighting conditions, and against different backgrounds. Moreover, efforts should be made to minimize bias and inconsistencies in the data that could lead to skewed or unfair model behavior. The presence of other objects, such as pedestrians, bicycles, and signs, can also be significant in providing a realistic training environment for the model.

The significance of data cleaning, preprocessing, and labeling

Data cleaning and preprocessing are vital steps in the machine learning pipeline that substantially improve data quality and model performance. These steps are like preparing the soil before planting a crop. The better the preparation, the better the yield.

Along with cleaning and preprocessing, data labeling and annotation is an often overlooked but equally crucial step. Labeling involves assigning meaningful and accurate labels or annotations to the data samples, which is essential for supervised learning tasks.

Data labeling is the process of manually or semi-automatically assigning labels or annotations to data instances, making them suitable for training machine learning models. It involves domain experts or annotators who know and understand the data to label it correctly. Data labeling ensures that the model can learn from labeled examples and make accurate predictions on unseen data.

Data labeling can be a challenging task due to various factors:

  • The complexity and diversity of the data may require domain expertise to assign labels accurately. For example, in a medical imaging dataset, identifying different types of abnormalities may require specialized knowledge from radiologists.

  • Ensuring label consistency and inter-annotator agreement is crucial, especially when multiple annotators are involved. Maintaining consistency across annotations helps reduce noise and improves the overall quality of the labeled dataset.

  • Scaling the labeling process to handle large datasets within time and cost constraints can be a logistical challenge.

Strategies for ensuring high-quality labels include thorough training and guidelines for annotators, regular quality checks and feedback loops, and inter-annotator agreement measurements. Establishing clear labeling instructions, providing reference materials or sample annotations, and conducting regular meetings or discussions with annotators help align their understanding and ensure consistency in labeling. Quality checks involve randomly reviewing a subset of labeled data to assess the accuracy and consistency of annotations. Feedback loops allow for ongoing communication and clarification between annotators and data scientists, further refining the labeling process.

How data labeling platforms help improve data quality

automation-tools-offered-by-kili-technology-s-platform-for-accurate-data-labelingTo streamline the data labeling process and ensure high-quality labels, data scientists can leverage data labeling platforms like Kili Technology. These platforms provide a user-friendly interface for annotators, enabling them to label large datasets while maintaining consistency and accuracy efficiently.

Kili Technology offers a range of advanced features that simplify and enhance the data labeling process. It allows for creating customized interfaces, which are intuitive and configurable, enabling annotators to start labeling data in minutes. Data scientists can assign assets to specific labelers and add validation rules, providing clear labeling guidelines and maintaining the consistency of the labeling process.

Additionally, Kili Technology can leverage your own-model predictions to pre-label data. This feature speeds up the labeling process, making annotators' work two to ten times faster. Monitoring and ensuring data quality are critical aspects of the data labeling process. Kili provides state-of-the-art quality metrics, allowing data scientists to quickly identify quality problems and focus their review on data that matters. These metrics enable data scientists to spot anomalies and swiftly solve errors through powerful workflows.

Simplifying the collaborative process, Kili Technology caters to both technical and business teams and outsourcing annotation companies. It allows easy integration with Amazon, Google, and Microsoft cloud storage and enables data scientists to export versioned data directly in the model's format, simplifying the LabelingOps. Finally, Kili's API and Python SDK are valuable tools for data scientists to connect any ML stack, and webhooks can be used to automate the MLOps infrastructure.

These platforms can streamline the data labeling process, improve the efficiency of annotators, ensure labeling consistency, and ultimately enhance the quality of the labeled dataset. They serve as valuable tools in the iterative data preparation phase, allowing data scientists to focus on refining the labeling instructions, monitoring the labeling process, and addressing any challenges that arise, ultimately leading to high-quality labeled data for training machine learning models.

Some techniques for assessing data quality

  1. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)

Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) is a fundamental technique used to assess data quality. It involves thoroughly examining the data to identify trends, patterns, and outliers, similar to how a doctor conducts a comprehensive examination before diagnosing.

For instance, during EDA, you can plot the distribution of different features and observe if they are heavily skewed or exhibit a long tail of outliers. These patterns might indicate the need for transformations or scaling to improve the data quality.

  1. Feature Correlation and Redundancy

Correlation analysis is another technique that aids in assessing data quality. It helps identify redundant features that add unnecessary complexity without providing much information gain. An example of redundant features could be having both temperature values in Fahrenheit and Celsius, where one representation is sufficient. Removing such redundant features can streamline the dataset and improve the efficiency and quality of the data.

  1. Handling Missing, Inconsistent, or Outlier Data

Data quality assessment also involves missing, inconsistent, or outlier data. Incomplete or inconsistent data can significantly impact the performance and reliability of machine learning models.

Techniques like consistency checks can help identify inconsistencies in the data, such as checking if a customer's age is a negative number or if there are any other logical inconsistencies. Anomaly detection methods, such as Z-score or Interquartile Range (IQR) methods, can detect outliers or extreme values that might distort the data quality.

Addressing missing, inconsistent, or outlier data requires careful data preprocessing, which may involve techniques like imputation for missing data, data cleaning to resolve inconsistencies, and outlier detection and treatment. Addressing these data issues can improve the overall quality and reliability of the dataset used for training machine learning models.

By employing these techniques for assessing data quality, you can gain insights into the characteristics of your data, identify potential issues or inconsistencies, and take appropriate steps to ensure that your data meets the desired quality standards.

The role of domain knowledge in data quality evaluation

Domain knowledge is the understanding of the specific area in which the problem resides. It is pivotal in data quality evaluation, like a local guide who knows the terrain like the back of their hand. A healthcare ML problem will have very different data quality requirements than a stock market prediction problem.

Consider developing a natural language processing (NLP) model for sentiment analysis for financial news articles. In this case, domain knowledge would play a significant role in data quality evaluation. Evaluating the quality of data for an NLP task requires understanding the specific context and nuances of the text data, which in this case, involves financial terms and jargon. For example, in financial news, certain phrases or terms could have specific meanings that differ from everyday language. The statement "Company XYZ is underwater" might be negative, indicating that its liabilities exceed its assets. A data scientist without financial knowledge might miss these nuances, decreasing the accuracy of sentiment classification.

Balancing Quantity and Quality in Your Data

The quantity and quality of data can significantly influence the model's performance. Balancing the quantity and quality of data is a multi-faceted task involving strategic data collection, augmentation, labeling, and quality checks. This dynamic balance should be continuously monitored and adjusted according to the model's performance and the evolving requirements of the problem domain.

Strategies for getting more data

When answering "how much data," the maxim "the more data, the better" holds in most scenarios. Larger datasets typically provide a more comprehensive representation of the problem space, leading to better model performance. However, obtaining more data is only sometimes feasible due to time, privacy, or budget constraints. Here, several strategies can come to the rescue.

Hard mining is one such approach. In a face recognition task, hard mining would involve deliberately seeking out more challenging examples that the model currently misclassifies, such as faces in unusual lighting conditions, rare facial expressions, or odd angles.

Active learning is another strategy where the model itself identifies the instances it is uncertain about, and these are then manually labeled and added to the training set. This approach can be especially beneficial when labeling data is expensive or requires expert knowledge. 

image-augmentation-results-from-a-data-augmentation-processSimple image augmentations can improve the generalization capability of your dataset

Data augmentation methods like rotations, translations, or flips for image data or word replacements for text data can effectively enhance your dataset's diversity and generalization capability. 

Advanced techniques like Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) or Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) can generate synthetic data, but make sure that the synthetic data is realistic and relevant to the problem domain.

Dealing with class imbalance

Class imbalance, where one class significantly outnumbers others, can skew your model's learning and lead to suboptimal predictions. In a fraud detection problem, for example, the number of non-fraud transactions often greatly surpasses the fraud ones, and this imbalance can cause the model to predict the majority class overwhelmingly.

Addressing this issue requires thoughtful strategies. Over-sampling techniques increase the number of instances in the minority class, which can involve replicating them or generating synthetic examples. Under-sampling techniques reduce the number of cases in the majority class while preserving the distribution of the minority class. The Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) is a technique that generates synthetic examples for the minority class to address class imbalance issues. Choosing a method that best suits your problem and data distribution while considering the impact on model performance and specific requirements is crucial.

Ensuring data diversity and representativeness

Ensuring your data is diverse, and representative of the problem space is just as important as having sufficient data. This aspect of data quality is like a colorful mosaic that captures the various shades and elements of the bigger picture. For a model predicting customer behavior in an e-commerce setting, data should reflect different demographics, purchasing behaviors, and product categories to avoid bias and enable the model to generalize well.

Lack of diversity or representativeness can lead to model bias and poor performance on unseen or under-represented groups. Techniques like stratified sampling help ensure that the proportions of different subgroups in the sample match the balances in the population. Additionally, continuous monitoring and updating of your data collection process can help maintain data diversity and representativeness over time.

Advanced methods to determine how much data is needed for machine learning

Machine learning can also be used to determine how much data is necessary for your applications. Advancements in the field have made it so we can take a data-driven approach to estimate the amount of data for achieving a desired performance target. 

For example, learning curves have become a popular approach to deciding on the amount of data required for a study. A study on classification performance found that fitting an inverse power law model to learning curves created using a small annotated training set can be used to predict the classifier's performance and provide a confidence interval for larger sample sizes.

This method has been proven to be helpful in not only providing a more exact number of how much training data is required to reach a performance target but can also show data scientists where an increase in data stops being as useful. 

Another study found that following two criteria can help in evaluating the right amount of data required for the study: 

The first criterion is to calculate the average and grand effect sizes of the data. Researchers recommended that the effect sizes of a decided sample size should be equal to or more than 0.5 according to Cohen's scale to attain good ML accuracy. 

The second criterion is that the ML accuracy of the decided sample size should be equal to or more than 80% and that changes inaccuracies in comparing multiple sample sizes should be smaller than 10%.

The study also concludes that effect sizes and ML accuracies plateau after a certain number of samples. Therefore, high-quality data should remain a priority, especially when researchers can access only a small amount of data.

Monitoring and Improving Your Model's Performance

Tracking performance metrics and setting benchmarks

Tracking the right performance metrics and setting appropriate benchmarks is like navigating with a compass in the machine learning journey. It allows you to measure your model's progress and pinpoint improvement areas. For instance, in a binary classification problem like email spam detection, you might monitor metrics like precision, recall, F1-score, and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC-ROC). Choosing the metrics that align with your business objectives and problem specifics is crucial. 

Setting benchmarks is also key. These can be derived from the performance of existing models or systems, business requirements, or even human performance on the task. Benchmarks are a tangible target for your model's performance and guide your efforts during model development and improvement.

Cross-validation and model selection

Cross-validation is a powerful technique used to estimate the model's ability to generalize to unseen data, helping prevent overfitting and assisting in model selection. Cross-validation splits the training data into several subsets or "folds." The model is trained on some of these folds and tested on the remaining one, and this process is repeated with different folds serving as the test set.

For example, in k-fold cross-validation, you might divide your data into five folds and thus have five iterations of training and validation, each time with a different fold serving as the validation set. The performance measure is then averaged over these iterations. This helps ensure that your model's performance is not dependent on a specific train-test split.

Regular model updates and retraining

AI models also need regular updates and retraining to maintain their performance. This is particularly true for models dealing with dynamic environments where data distributions can change over time. For example, a model predicting stock prices will need frequent retraining to adapt to the evolving market trends.

Additionally, models can benefit from learning new data that reflects recent changes or trends. For instance, a recommendation system for an e-commerce platform should be retrained with new user interaction data to stay relevant and effective.

The importance of continuous feedback loops for model drifting

Incorporating continuous feedback loops into your model lifecycle can help fine-tune the model and promptly address any emerging issues.

A feedback loop can be a system where predictions made by the model are reviewed, and the results are used to correct and train the model. For example, in a sentiment analysis model for social media posts, user feedback on incorrect sentiment tags could be incorporated back into the training data.

Such feedback loops can also help recognize model drift, where the model's performance degrades over time due to changes in the underlying data distribution. This is common in dynamic environments such as user behavior, financial markets, or social media sentiment. By monitoring the model's performance and the incoming data, we can detect model drift and trigger model retraining or adaptation when necessary.


The need for a data-driven approach in ML model training

Data is the lifeblood that fuels algorithmic success. A data-centric AI approach is being recognized as pivotal in successfully developing and deploying machine learning models. This approach emphasizes the importance of data quality and quantity during the initial model training and ongoing model updates.

The data-centric AI approach puts a premium on data quality, urging the meticulous labeling, cleaning, and overall preparation of data. This approach often leads to better performance improvements than merely tweaking the model architecture.

The iterative nature of determining data quantity and quality

Determining the correct data quantity and quality is akin to tuning a musical instrument. It isn't a one-time process but an iterative one, continually refined to harmonize with the evolving performance of the model and the dynamics of the problem being solved. For example, an AI system for diagnosing medical conditions might initially be trained with a specific dataset. As it is tested with more diverse patients and conditions, more representative data is likely required to improve its accuracy.

Ensuring success through a solid foundation of high-quality data

Success in AI is much like building a sturdy structure. It begins with a solid foundation of high-quality data. The better the quality and representativeness of your data, the better your model's ability to learn, generalize, and perform. A recommendation system for a movie streaming service, for instance, will be only as good as the user behavior data it learns from. Biased, incomplete, or outdated data will likely lead to poor recommendations and user dissatisfaction.

In summary, while the complexity of algorithms and the sophistication of machine learning techniques continue to grow, the importance of data - its quality, quantity, diversity, and relevance - remains fundamental to success in any AI endeavor. Good data, coupled with careful monitoring and iterative refinement, paves the way for superior model performance and meaningful applications of AI.

Additional References

Open-Sourced Data Quality Assessment Library - YData 

DataCamp Course - Introduction to Data Quality

Coursera - Measuring Total Data Quality

Kaggle Data Quality Assessment Example

Predicting sample size required for classification performance

Evaluation of a decided sample size in machine learning applications

Imbalanced-learn: A Python Toolbox to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning

Frequent Questions

What constitutes good-quality data for machine learning models? 

Good-quality data for machine learning models are characterized by accuracy, relevance, completeness, diversity, validity, and timeliness. It should be free from biases and inconsistencies and accurately represent the modeled problem or phenomena.

How can I know if I have enough training data for my machine learning model? 

Determining whether you have enough training data depends on several factors, such as the complexity of the problem and the chosen model. Generally, you should aim for at least a few thousand samples per class. However, if your model isn't performing up to the desired standards after the first training iteration, it might signal that more data is needed. You can also use more advanced techniques, such as a learning curve to determine the amount of data you need to reach a specific ML accuracy.

What are some strategies to acquire more training data if I don't have enough?

If you need more data, you can consider strategies such as hard mining, active learning, data augmentation, and employing techniques to generate synthetic data. You can also use foundation models and public datasets to your advantage.

How can I assess the quality of my dataset for machine learning?

Several techniques can help in assessing data quality. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) can be used to identify trends, patterns, and outliers in your data. Feature correlation and redundancy analysis can help identify and remove noisy or unnecessary data. Handling missing, inconsistent, or outlier data is also crucial to data quality assessment. Incorporating domain knowledge can further aid in understanding the relevance and importance of different data features, which assists in effective preprocessing and cleaning.

How do I balance data quantity and quality? 

The data quantity and quality balance is context-dependent and should be evaluated iteratively. While having a large amount of data can help train more complex models, poor-quality data can lead to poor performance. It's crucial to start with high-quality data and assess whether the quantity is sufficient based on the model's performance. If the model's performance is lacking, consider strategies for acquiring more high-quality data. 


Continue reading
Get started

Get Started!

Build better data, now.