The Best Alternative to CVAT for Enterprise-Level Annotation
CVAT may be a popular open-source option, but enterprise AI teams quickly hit roadblocks when scaling to production. Complex datasets, distributed teams, and demanding ML pipelines require a robust, enterprise-ready platform. Kili Technology delivers where CVAT falls short.
Trusted by Computer Vision Engineers

[1]
Beyond CVAT's Performance Ceiling
Enterprise ML projects demand speed and reliability that open-source tools simply can't deliver. CVAT users consistently report performance degradation with larger datasets, risking lost work and missed deadlines.
Kili Technology was built from the ground up for enterprise-scale annotation, with architecture designed to handle your most demanding projects:
Handle datasets 10x larger with stable, predictable performance
Reduce annotation time by up to 10x with AI-assisted labeling
Work with any file format: images, PDFs, video, and geospatial data
Maintain annotation quality with automated validation systems
Keep teams aligned with real-time collaboration tools

[2]
Transform Team Collaboration, Not Just Annotations
CVAT was designed for individual contributors, not enterprise teams. Without built-in notification systems, team communication tools, or robust user management, coordination becomes a major challenge as teams scale.
Kili Technology makes collaboration central to the annotation experience:
Keep teams connected with integrated question and answering and activity tracking
Resolve questions directly with in-context commenting on specific annotations
Scale confidently with role-based permissions and customizable workflows
Stay informed with automated notifications when tasks are completed
Simplify enterprise deployment with SSO and advanced user management
[3]
Built for Subject Matter Experts in Every Domain
CVAT's technical foundation creates limitations for specialized annotation projects. Its rigid architecture and complex interface introduces friction for domain experts, while critical enterprise features remain absent.
Kili Technology was designed from the ground up for professional teams across all domains:
Focus on your annotations, not the tool, with an intuitive domain-adaptive interface
Refine annotations directly with integrated image manipulation tools
Leverage domain-specific knowledge through customizable foundation models and algorithms
Process datasets up to 3x faster than CVAT with optimized data pipelines
Model complex domain relationships with nested ontologies and semantic connections

[4]
Quality at Scale: Beyond Manual Reviews
Data quality makes or breaks ML models, yet CVAT leaves quality assurance entirely to manual processes. As projects scale, this approach becomes unsustainable, leading to inconsistent datasets and model performance issues.
Kili Technology's quality-first approach includes:
Prevent errors before they happen with automated validation rules
Measure team consistency with advanced inter-annotator agreement metrics
Identify problematic examples with statistical outlier detection
Enforce annotation standards automatically across your entire dataset
Visualize quality metrics with comprehensive dashboards and reporting
[5]
Enterprise Security Without Compromise
CVAT's security limitations create serious concerns for sensitive data projects. Documented vulnerabilities and the need for constant updates introduce unnecessary risk to your ML development workflow.
Kili Technology provides enterprise-grade security that meets the highest compliance standards:
Trust in certification: ISO27001 and SOC2 compliance verified by independent auditors
Protect sensitive data with HIPAA and GDPR compliant processes
Deploy your way: cloud, on-premise, or hybrid options available
Connect securely to your existing data infrastructure on AWS, GCP, and Azure
Automate workflows with comprehensive API access and Python SDK
A professional workforce to scale faster
For companies and institutions needing faster scaling, Kili Technology has a global network of highly trainable professional geospatial annotators. Our platform's collaborative and quality features allow you to keep full control to monitor and iterate on your dataset.
Discover our networkThey Trust Us
Computer Vision Resources
Frequent Questions
How does Kili Technology's user interface compare to CVAT's?
Kili Technology features a highly intuitive and user-friendly interface with a gentle learning curve, making onboarding fast and efficient. Users consistently report better document/image visibility, clearer workflow indicators, and more convenient shortcuts that streamline the annotation process. In contrast, CVAT's interface, while functional and customizable, can be complex and overwhelming for new users, with a steeper learning curve and navigation that many find dense with multiple sidebars and panels.
What collaboration features does Kili offer that CVAT doesn't?
Kili Technology provides built-in review and Q&A features with real-time collaboration capabilities, including integrated question and answering, activity feeds, and in-task commenting. The platform offers automated notifications when tasks are completed and annotator-based filters to efficiently manage team workflows. CVAT, while supporting simultaneous annotation, lacks real-time communication tools, task completion notifications, and annotator-based filtering, making workflow management less efficient for large or distributed teams.
How do the platforms handle large datasets and performance issues?
Kili Technology is optimized for speed and efficiency with large datasets, utilizing advanced tools like tile-based processing for high-resolution files. Users experience stable, predictable performance even with multi-gigabyte datasets. CVAT users frequently report performance problems when handling large datasets or complex tasks, with slow processing times and risks of data loss during server outages or platform disruptions, as unsaved progress cannot always be recovered.
What quality control features differentiate Kili Technology from CVAT?
Kili Technology includes comprehensive automated quality assurance tools, including validation rules, inter-annotator agreement metrics, statistical outlier detection, and advanced quality dashboards. These features automatically enforce annotation standards and help identify potential errors. CVAT requires all quality assurance to be performed manually, with no automated validation or checking of annotations, significantly increasing the time and effort required for quality control in large-scale projects.
What file types and annotation capabilities does each platform support?
Kili Technology supports a broader range of file types, including native support for images, PDFs, videos, and geospatial files (.geotiff). It offers advanced annotation capabilities like interactive segmentation augmented with foundation models, nested ontologies, and relationship annotations. CVAT supports standard annotation types (bounding boxes, polygons, etc.) but lacks native PDF support and geospatial file compatibility, requiring users to convert files before annotation, which adds extra steps to workflows.
How do the AI integration capabilities compare between the two platforms?
Kili Technology provides robust AI integration with foundation model support (including SAM for segmentation), custom model integration, and active learning capabilities that optimize annotation effort. The platform enables model-based pre-annotations and AI-driven auto-segmentation that significantly reduce manual work. CVAT offers some automation via plugins and scripts but has no built-in active learning or automated quality checks, relying more heavily on manual processes.
What security and enterprise features differentiate Kili Technology from CVAT?
Kili Technology provides enterprise-grade security with ISO27001 and SOC2 certification, HIPAA and GDPR compliance, and flexible deployment options (cloud, on-premise, or hybrid). It offers SSO integration, robust user management, and seamless integration with cloud storage providers. CVAT has documented security vulnerabilities requiring regular updates, limited documentation for developers, and requires considerable maintenance to avoid exposing users to bugs, incompatibilities, and security risks.